Thomas Jefferson was a conundrum in his personal life, his life of
faith, and on slave ownership. He is viewed as a racist, yet he had a
lengthy relationship with a mixed race slave, fathering six children
with her. Jefferson held views of limited government yet, while
president, he orchestrated the Louisiana Purchase and war against
Barbary pirates without Congress or the states’ involvement in the
decisions.
Would Thomas Jefferson have carried a NRA card in his wallet? Would
he have been seen sticking a ‘Guns Rights’ bumper sticker on his
horse-drawn carriage? I confess that after the support the NRA gave for
Indiana legislation on their ‘Castle Doctrine’ widely reported to give
citizens the right to shoot police entering their home when they
‘believed’ the officer was acting illegally, I was ready to toss my NRA
membership in the trash. Since then, more accurate reporting shows that
the bill was in response to a difficult state supreme court last year
that denied fourth amendment rights to homeowners and that even with the
section on police officers, it is supported by the Indiana Sheriffs’
Association and the Indiana Chiefs of Police Association. But, I
digress. What about Jefferson’s attitude toward the 2nd Amendment and
how it plays out with current gun control hysteria in today’s White
House?
I will share with you here some quotes and you will see they each
have a direct correlation to the current battles with the Executive
branch of our federal government concerning the 2nd Amendment. Pres.
Obama is on record that he will require registrations by gun and
ammunition manufacturers to make tracking of both easy and direct. Gun
ownership under the UN Small Arms Treaty, being touted by Secretary of
State Hilary Clinton and President Obama, would effectively outlaw U.S.
citizens from owning most of the typical handguns, rifles, and shotguns
that are enjoyed by hunters, gun enthusiasts, and those seeking to save
their own life. Thomas Jefferson had an opinion. To make his point,
Jefferson quoted Cesare Beccaria the Italian author of On Crimes and
Punishment.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”[i]
Consider the points that Beccaria and Jefferson make here. First,
laws that make carrying a firearm illegal, only disarm those who are not
criminals! In other words, the bad guys now have all the guns! The good
guys have lost their primary protection for themselves and their
families, if this type of legislation is applied. Opponents argue that
Jefferson and Beccaria wrote at a different kind of time in American
life. That is very true. Crime rates have skyrocketed since those early
days! The folly of out-lawing gun carry laws is so incredibly obvious,
there should not need to be paper wasted here on it. I wonder what
Jefferson would say to Hilary Clinton, since both were/are Secretary of
State responsible for foreign policy, not national policies like gun
control.
Allow me more of an explanation than a confession here. When the
Carry Concealed law was first in the House here in Ohio I was still
Chief of Police for Louisville, Ohio. A ‘friend’ I had not met yet asked
me to go on record supporting the new CCW legislation and I told him I
could not. My reasoning was two-fold. First, I feared that state
standards for training would be poor. They have made it at a
satisfactory level; though it still depends a great deal on getting the
right instructor. Second, I told this gentleman that anything that could
cause my officer to hesitate for a split second could cost them their
lives. If they sense trouble and then see a gun carried on a person,
their first instinct is to draw down, move to cover, and order the
subject to not move. If he moves toward the gun, he is getting shot. But
what if he was reaching for his CCW credentials? Now, a ‘what if’
scenario is stuck in this cop’s head, he hesitates; the subject pulls a
gun and fires. I’m talking then to a widow and some small kids who just
lost their dad. Those were my concerns.
The legislation passed, and, so
far, no tragic accidents in Ohio that I am aware of that involve police
officers. YouTube and others went ballistic (pun intended!) about the
guy stopped and threatened to be shot by the Canton Ohio cop for being
‘too stupid to breath’ because he had a gun and the cops didn’t see the
Permit Card he was holding out the window the whole time. Everyone came
to the side of the ‘citizen.’ But, that citizen was in the worst part of
town, worst time of night, had a prostitute and her pimp in his car,
had taken pleasure from the prostitute in his car and there were drugs
in there too. Not the kind of guy I want having a CCW permit!
This
thought brings me to my second quote to consider because ‘rights’
require responsibility.
“The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed
until they try to take it.”
This is the first quote we will consider
that is believed to be fictitious, at least as from the point of being
said by Thomas Jefferson. There appears to be nothing in print for this
quote prior to 2007. Could it plausibly have been uttered by Jefferson
knowing what we know of his life and times? First, Jefferson, according
to historians, was a very strong Republican which meant that he desired
strong state government versus federal government. Jefferson preferred
that the federal government steer as clear from interfering in the
everyday lives of its citizens as possible. Read the fictitious quote
again. From everything I have read about the well-read, former
Ambassador to France, Secretary of State and President; I believe he
would have agreed whole-heartedly with it. We shall do it service and
not list Jefferson as the source.
How about the title quote for this article?
“The policy of the
American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining
nor aiding them in their pursuits.”[ii]
This particular quote,
according to American Revival is correctly attributed to Thomas
Jefferson. Think on the ramifications of taking seriously what Jefferson
is saying there. The policy of our government is to leave citizens
free. The government is not to prevent them from their pursuit of
happiness or help them. Certainly, Jefferson refers only to those
pursuits that do not impinge on the rights of others, nor break the law.
However, the entire concept of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid… can
those be covered by “provide for the general welfare” part of the
Constitution? Depends on how you define ‘general’ and that is too big an
issue to get into here. What about auto maker bailouts? Jefferson, I
believe, would turn over in his grave if he heard that whole fiasco and
how now the Obama White House is touting how much the bailouts turned
the country around. Of course, no mention is made that it was Pres. Bush
that began the bailouts and told Obama he should continue them. Such is
politics. Can you grasp how Jefferson would see these social programs
and financial bailouts as gross over-extensions of Executive and federal
power not provided for in the Constitution?
“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the
government fears the people, there is liberty.”[iii]
This particular
quote is correctly credited to a Thomas, but not Jefferson. It was
Thomas Payne who wrote this, most likely part of the Federalist Papers
at the beginning stages of the Revolution. Perhaps the worst fear today
is that the government has grown so large that the citizens can no
longer direct its course. As it runs, like an over-sized Albatross
screaming, “Mine, Mine, Mine, Mine!”[iv] All we can do is watch it reach
the precipice and fall headlong over the edge, the birds not even aware
of the danger of death. The government no longer fears the people but
rather it manipulates and sound-bites them to death until the fiction
stands like a strong symbol of truth. It is now that every conservative
American citizen needs to educate themselves on the issues, talk up the
strategies of the key players, read and understand, then share your
views with friends and neighbors. It is not usually a question of ‘can
you’ as much as it is a standard of ‘will you.’
Finally, for my cop readers who have loyally come to the Police
Blotter to get some kind of an idea as to what you can expect in your
neighborhoods, the SCI team has been working to piece together how the
unrest in Syria will impact you. Those of you in larger metropolitan
areas, especially with a lot of mixed neighborhoods or closed hoods that
are intersecting with one another with competing races, this time the
tables are turned. We are looking for your help. Here is what we need:
If you are in racially diverse neighborhoods, identify for SCI who
the groups are. Syrians and Iranians? Chileans and Italians? Jews and
Arabs? Whatever the case might be, we at SCI would like to know from
you, when you have identify the groups:
- What is the key ‘hot button’ topic that will set the groups off …
- Against the other?
- Within their own group?
- What, if anything, has settled it?
- If it continues, what are the things that have been tried and failed?
- Do you see Constitutional issues at play where you are?
- What are they?
- Have either the federal or state government tried some kind of program?
The best responses, as determined by our elite panel of judges
(assuming the answers are in before my granddaughter’s pre-school
finishes for the summer) or an alternate set of ‘not-so-elite’ judges
will confer awards. We want to reward those of you who have been
faithful readers, so get your answers in. Even if you are not a beat
cop, but you are seeing things that provide you with answers for the
above questions, you are eligible.
You can reply directly through the ‘Comments’ part of the Blog.
[Dr. Ross L. Riggs www.docriggs.com www.security-consulting.us www.globalsecurityconsulting.us]
_________________________________________________
[i] http://jpetrie.myweb.uga.edu/TJ.html accessed 08/April/2012
[ii] http://www.americanrevival.org/quotes/forefathers.htm accessed 09/April/2012
[iii] Ibid.
[iv] Disney-Pixar Ice Age the movie